PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HSGFX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HSGFX and ^GSPC is -0.44. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.4

Performance

HSGFX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.05%
9.05%
HSGFX
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HSGFX:

-0.51

^GSPC:

1.77

Sortino Ratio

HSGFX:

-0.69

^GSPC:

2.39

Omega Ratio

HSGFX:

0.92

^GSPC:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

HSGFX:

-0.09

^GSPC:

2.66

Martin Ratio

HSGFX:

-0.87

^GSPC:

10.85

Ulcer Index

HSGFX:

6.14%

^GSPC:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

HSGFX:

10.61%

^GSPC:

12.79%

Max Drawdown

HSGFX:

-65.71%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

HSGFX:

-60.68%

^GSPC:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSGFX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -3.54%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.


HSGFX

YTD

0.73%

1M

0.73%

6M

0.13%

1Y

-5.05%

5Y*

2.51%

10Y*

-3.54%

^GSPC

YTD

4.22%

1M

2.22%

6M

9.51%

1Y

22.46%

5Y*

12.74%

10Y*

11.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HSGFX vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HSGFX is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HSGFX is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HSGFX is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HSGFX is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HSGFX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HSGFX is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HSGFX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HSGFX, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.511.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for HSGFX, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.692.39
The chart of Omega ratio for HSGFX, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.000.921.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for HSGFX, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00-0.092.66
The chart of Martin ratio for HSGFX, currently valued at -0.87, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00-0.8710.85
HSGFX
^GSPC

The current HSGFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSGFX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.51
1.77
HSGFX
^GSPC

Drawdowns

HSGFX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSGFX drawdown since its inception was -65.71%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSGFX and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-60.68%
0
HSGFX
^GSPC

Volatility

HSGFX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 3.11% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.11%
3.19%
HSGFX
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab